Roles in Dysfunctional Families

Analysis and Healing from the Golden Child, Scapegoat, Enabler, Flying Monkey and Other Dysfunctional Family Roles

40 min readOct 7, 2024

The Origins of Role Dynamics in Dysfunctional Families
The Golden Child
The Enabler
The Flying Monkey
The Scapegoat
Additional Roles in Dysfunctional Families
Breaking the Cycle
Conclusion

Human beings are inherently social creatures, seeking connection, belonging, and a sense of purpose. Within the family unit, roles naturally emerge to help navigate complex interpersonal dynamics and meet emotional needs. In healthy families, these roles are flexible, supportive, and promote individual growth. However, in dysfunctional families, roles often become rigid, maladaptive, and deeply ingrained, serving as coping mechanisms in environments fraught with chaos, neglect, or abuse (Minuchin, 1974).

This article describes the origins and impacts of dysfunctional family roles, exploring how and why they are formed and assumed. We will examine the psychological and social foundations that lead individuals to adopt specific roles such as the Golden Child, the Enabler, the Flying Monkey, and the Scapegoat. By understanding the motivations and consequences associated with each role, we can shed light on the complex interplay between individual behaviors and family systems.

To illustrate these concepts, we will draw parallels with historical figures who exemplify each role:

The Golden Child: Louis XVI of France, whose privileged upbringing and excessive praise left him ill-prepared for the challenges of leadership, ultimately contributing to his downfall (Fraser, 2002).
The Enabler: Eva Braun, whose unwavering support of Adolf Hitler exemplifies the extreme consequences of enabling behavior in the face of ethical atrocities (Görtemaker, 2011).
The Scapegoat: Philosophers Socrates and Galileo Galilei, both persecuted for challenging societal norms and exposing uncomfortable truths, mirroring the scapegoat’s role in confronting dysfunctional dynamics (Taylor, 2001; Reston, 1994).

Additionally, we will discuss other roles such as the Hero, the Lost Child, and the Mascot, each contributing uniquely to the family’s equilibrium while concealing underlying issues. Recognizing and addressing these roles is a critical step toward breaking the cycle of dysfunction. Throughout this article, we will explore strategies for healing and growth, emphasizing the importance of self-awareness, therapy, and establishing healthy boundaries.

Ultimately, the goal is to empower individuals to transform their inherited roles, fostering resilience and paving the way for healthier relationships and a more authentic sense of self.

Chapter 1: The Origins of Role Dynamics in Dysfunctional Families

1.1 Psychological and Social Foundations

Families serve as the primary environment where individuals develop their identities, values, and coping mechanisms. In a healthy family system, roles are fluid and adapt to the changing needs of its members. However, in dysfunctional families, roles often become rigid and maladaptive, emerging as survival strategies in response to stress, trauma, or unhealthy dynamics (Bowen, 1978).

Several psychological and social foundations contribute to the development of these roles:

Attachment theory posits that the emotional bonds formed between caregivers and children significantly influence an individual’s ability to form relationships throughout life (Bowlby, 1988). Insecure attachments — resulting from neglect, inconsistency, or abuse — can lead children to adopt certain roles to secure a sense of safety and belonging. For example, a child might become the Enabler to gain approval or avoid abandonment.

Family systems theory views the family as an interconnected unit where each member’s behavior affects the whole (Minuchin, 1974). Dysfunction arises when boundaries are blurred and roles become inflexible. Members may unconsciously adopt roles like the Hero or the Scapegoat to restore balance or divert attention from underlying issues. These roles serve as coping mechanisms to manage anxiety and maintain a semblance of stability.

Children learn behaviors and social norms by observing and imitating family members. In dysfunctional families, maladaptive behaviors such as denial, manipulation, or aggression may be normalized (Bandura, 1977). A child witnessing a parent enabling harmful behavior might internalize this as acceptable, later adopting the Enabler role themselves.

Dysfunctional patterns and roles are often passed down through generations. Unresolved trauma, unmet needs, and unhealthy coping strategies can become ingrained in the family’s fabric (Friesen et al., 2013). Without intervention, children may unconsciously replicate the roles of their parents or caregivers, perpetuating the cycle of dysfunction.

Cultural norms and societal expectations can reinforce certain family roles. For instance, a culture that discourages emotional expression might foster the development of the Lost Child role. Societal pressures to appear successful may push a family to elevate one member as the Golden Child, masking internal dysfunction (Hofstede, 2001).

1.2 Formation and Selection of Roles

The assignment of roles within a dysfunctional family is rarely a conscious process. Instead, it evolves from a complex interplay of individual characteristics, family dynamics, and environmental factors.

A person’s innate temperament influences how they respond to family stressors. An assertive child might rebel against dysfunction, becoming the Scapegoat, while a compliant child might assume the Peacemaker role to minimize conflict (Chess & Thomas, 1996). Personal resilience, sensitivity, and adaptability all play a part in role formation.

Parents or primary caregivers often project their unmet needs or desires onto their children. A parent who yearns for success might pressure a child into the Hero role, expecting them to achieve what they could not. Alternatively, a parent struggling with their own issues might unconsciously assign blame to a child, creating a Scapegoat (Johnson, 1994).

Sibling relationships and birth order can significantly impact role development. The eldest child might feel compelled to be the Hero, taking on responsibilities beyond their years. Middle children may become the Lost Child, feeling overlooked between their siblings. Dynamics such as favoritism or rivalry further solidify these roles (Sulloway, 1996).

Roles are often adaptive responses aimed at navigating and surviving a dysfunctional environment. By adopting a specific role, individuals attempt to meet their needs for safety, love, and acceptance (Ackerman, 1983). For example, the Mascot uses humor to deflect tension and avoid confrontation, while the Enabler maintains harmony by appeasing the abuser.

Significant life events — such as financial hardship, illness, or loss — can exacerbate dysfunction and cement roles. In the face of trauma, family members might cling more tightly to their roles as a means of coping, even if those roles are detrimental in the long term (Walsh, 2006).

1.3 Impact on Family Dynamics

The establishment of rigid roles in a dysfunctional family has far-reaching consequences for both individual members and the family unit as a whole.

Roles like the Enabler and Flying Monkey actively support and conceal harmful behaviors, preventing acknowledgment and resolution of underlying issues (Brown, 1988). This perpetuates the dysfunctional cycle, making it difficult for the family to heal and grow.

Fixed roles hinder open and honest communication. Members interact based on their assigned roles rather than their authentic selves, leading to misunderstandings and emotional distance (Satir, 1988). The Lost Child, for example, may withdraw completely, leaving their feelings unexpressed and unheard.

Family members suffer various emotional and psychological impacts:

Anxiety and Depression: The constant pressure to fulfill a role can lead to chronic stress, anxiety, and feelings of inadequacy (Hinshaw, 2008).
Low Self-Esteem: Members may base their self-worth on their ability to perform their role, making them vulnerable to self-doubt (Branden, 1994).
Identity Issues: Overidentification with a role can impede the development of a true sense of self, leading to confusion and inner conflict (Erikson, 1968).

Roles create barriers to genuine connection both within and outside the family:

Sibling Rivalry and Resentment: Favoritism towards the Golden Child can breed jealousy and resentment among siblings, damaging relationships (Kowal & Kramer, 1997).
Difficulty Forming External Relationships: Learned behaviors may negatively impact friendships and romantic partnerships. For instance, the Enabler might tolerate unhealthy behaviors in others, replicating familiar patterns (Forward & Buck, 1989).

Efforts by individuals to break free from their roles often meet resistance:

Family Sabotage: The family system may unconsciously undermine attempts at change to maintain the status quo (Nichols, 2013).
Internal Conflict: Breaking away from a role can trigger guilt, fear, or a sense of loss as the individual grapples with unfamiliar ways of relating (Janzen et al., 2006).

Without intervention, these dysfunctional roles can be transmitted to the next generation, embedding the cycle deeper. Children raised in such environments may adopt similar roles or develop maladaptive coping mechanisms, perpetuating the family’s dysfunction (Friesen et al., 2013).

Ackerman, R. (1983). Children of Alcoholics: A Guidebook for Educators, Therapists, and Parents. Simon & Schuster.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.
Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. Jason Aronson.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.
Branden, N. (1994). The Six Pillars of Self-Esteem. Bantam.
Brown, S. (1988). Treating Adult Children of Alcoholics: A Developmental Perspective. Wiley.
Chess, S., & Thomas, A. (1996). Temperament: Theory and Practice. Brunner/Mazel.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. W. W. Norton.
Forward, S., & Buck, C. (1989). Betrayal of Innocence: Incest and Its Devastation. Penguin Books.
Fraser, A. (2002). Marie Antoinette: The Journey. Anchor. (Note: While this book focuses on Marie Antoinette, it provides context on Louis XVI.)
Friesen, M. D., Woodward, L. J., Horwood, L. J., & Fergusson, D. M. (2013). Life course persistent antisocial behavior in a New Zealand birth cohort. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44(2), 227–238.
Görtemaker, H. (2011). Eva Braun: Life with Hitler. Alfred A. Knopf.
Hinshaw, S. P. (2008). The Mark of Shame: Stigma of Mental Illness and an Agenda for Change. Oxford University Press.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Janzen, C., Harris, O., Jordan, C., & Franklin, C. (2006). Family Treatment: Evidence-Based Practice with Populations at Risk (4th ed.). Brooks/Cole.
Johnson, S. M. (1994). Character Styles. W. W. Norton.
Kowal, A., & Kramer, L. (1997). Children’s understanding of parental differential treatment. Child Development, 68(1), 113–126.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and Family Therapy. Harvard University Press.
Nichols, M. P. (2013). Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods (10th ed.). Pearson.
Reston, J. (1994). Galileo: A Life. HarperCollins.
Satir, V. (1988). The New Peoplemaking. Science and Behavior Books.
Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics, and Creative Lives. Pantheon Books.
Taylor, C. C. W. (2001). Socrates: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Walsh, F. (2006). Strengthening Family Resilience (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Chapter 2: The Golden Child

2.1 Characteristics of the Golden Child

In dysfunctional families, the Golden Child is often idealized and held up as a symbol of the family’s success and perfection. This child is placed on a pedestal, becoming the focal point for the family’s aspirations and the public image they wish to portray. The role serves to conceal deeper issues within the family by showcasing one member as exceptionally accomplished or well-behaved, thereby diverting attention from underlying dysfunction (Miller 1981).

Key characteristics of the Golden Child include excessive praise and high expectations. The child receives constant positive attention and affirmation, often in public settings. However, this favor comes with immense pressure to excel in various domains — academics, sports, or the arts — often beyond reasonable limits (Kapur 2015). Parents may project their own unfulfilled dreams onto the child, expecting them to achieve what they themselves could not. This creates a burden of responsibility that the child may feel compelled to bear (Segrin & Flora 2011).

Sibling relationships are significantly affected, as siblings are often unfavorably compared to the Golden Child, fostering resentment and rivalry (Kowal & Kramer 1997). This dynamic can strain familial bonds and contribute to a hostile environment. Additionally, the Golden Child may suppress their true desires and emotions to maintain their elevated status, prioritizing the family’s image over their personal well-being (Bradshaw 1988).

2.2 Psychological Impact on the Individual

While the Golden Child appears to enjoy numerous privileges, the psychological toll can be significant. Constantly living up to others’ expectations often leads to identity confusion, as the child struggles to differentiate their own desires from those imposed upon them (Harter 1999). They may develop perfectionist tendencies, where the need for flawless performance creates anxiety and a persistent fear of failure (Shafran & Mansell 2001).

The pressure to maintain an impeccable image also leads to emotional suppression. The child may find it difficult to express or even acknowledge negative emotions, fearing that such expressions could tarnish the family’s reputation or disappoint their parents (Gross & John 2003). This emotional burden, combined with the favoritism they receive, can isolate them from siblings and peers, who may view them with envy or hostility. As a result, their sense of self-worth becomes heavily tied to external validation, making them vulnerable to feelings of inadequacy when praise is absent (Deci & Ryan 2000).

2.3 Historical Example: Louis XVI of France

A historical example of the Golden Child archetype is Louis XVI of France, the last king before the French Revolution. Born into the House of Bourbon, Louis-Auguste became the Dauphin after the deaths of his father and older brothers, dramatically increasing the expectations placed upon him (Fraser 2001). His education was heavily focused on preparing him for kingship, yet it failed to equip him with practical leadership skills.

Idealized as the future saviour of the French monarchy, Louis faced immense pressure to restore the nation during a period of financial and social turmoil. However, his sheltered upbringing left him ill-prepared to meet these challenges (Jones 2010). He became indecisive, often avoiding difficult decisions and relying excessively on conflicting advice from his counsellors. His inability to address pressing issues, such as the grievances of the common people and the financial crisis, contributed to the collapse of the monarchy and his eventual execution during the Revolution (Schama 1989).

Louis XVI’s reign exemplifies how the Golden Child role can impair leadership and personal development. The unrealistic expectations placed on him, coupled with emotional isolation and avoidance of confrontation, hindered his ability to effectively navigate the complexities of his time.

2.4 Consequences and Long-Term Effects

The effects of being the Golden Child often extend into adulthood. Emotionally, these individuals may struggle with intimacy, finding it difficult to form deep, authentic connections due to their ingrained habit of suppressing true feelings (Miller 1981). They may also impose the same unrealistic standards they grew up with onto others, leading to strained personal and professional relationships (Cline & Fay 1990).

In their careers, Golden Children are often driven to perfectionism, which can lead to workaholism and burnout. Their fear of failure might cause them to avoid taking necessary risks, potentially stunting professional growth. Despite their achievements, they may suffer from impostor syndrome, constantly doubting their capabilities (Clance & Imes 1978).

Mentally, the chronic stress of striving for unattainable standards can result in anxiety, depression, and eventual emotional exhaustion. The relentless pursuit of perfection can erode their sense of identity and autonomy, making them reliant on others’ approval to feel validated (Shafran & Mansell 2001).

There is also the risk of perpetuating dysfunctional family dynamics. Without intervention, Golden Children may unconsciously assign similar rigid roles to their own children, passing down the patterns of dysfunction they experienced. Breaking this cycle requires significant self-awareness and effort (Siegel 2012).

2.5 Pathways to Healing

Healing from the negative impacts of the Golden Child role necessitates a multifaceted approach. Therapeutic intervention is crucial; engaging in psychotherapy can help individuals unpack the pressures they’ve internalized and develop healthier coping mechanisms. Therapies such as cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) or psychodynamic therapy can be particularly beneficial (Corey 2013).

Self-exploration is also essential. Engaging in activities that reflect personal interests allows individuals to build a stronger sense of identity separate from their prescribed role. This fosters autonomy and self-determination (Ryan & Deci 2000). Setting realistic goals and practicing self-compassion can reduce perfectionist tendencies and foster a healthier outlook (Neff 2003).

Building authentic relationships encourages emotional expression and deeper connections. Developing supportive relationships provides a safe space for the individual to express their true self (Johnson 2013). Additionally, practicing mindfulness and emotional awareness can enhance emotional regulation and increase awareness of one’s internal experiences, promoting psychological well-being (Kabat-Zinn 2003).

Bradshaw, J. (1988) Healing the Shame that Binds You. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications, Inc.
Clance, P.R. and Imes, S.A. (1978) ‘The Imposter Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention’, Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), pp. 241–247.
Cline, F. and Fay, J. (1990) Parenting with Love and Logic: Teaching Children Responsibility. Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress.
Corey, G. (2013) Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (2000) ‘The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior’, Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), pp. 227–268.
Fraser, A. (2001) Marie Antoinette: The Journey. London: Phoenix Press.
Gross, J.J. and John, O.P. (2003) ‘Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), pp. 348–362.
Harter, S. (1999) The Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
Johnson, S.M. (2013) Love Sense: The Revolutionary New Science of Romantic Relationships. New York: Little, Brown Spark.
Jones, C. (2010) The Great Nation: France from Louis XV to Napoleon. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003) ‘Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Context: Past, Present, and Future’, Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), pp. 144–156.
Kapur, M. (2015) Psychological Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Kowal, A. and Kramer, L. (1997) ‘Children’s Understanding of Parental Differential Treatment’, Child Development, 68(1), pp. 113–126.
Miller, A. (1981) The Drama of the Gifted Child: The Search for the True Self. New York: Basic Books.
Neff, K.D. (2003) ‘Self-Compassion: An Alternative Conceptualization of a Healthy Attitude Toward Oneself’, Self and Identity, 2(2), pp. 85–101.
Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2000) ‘Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being’, American Psychologist, 55(1), pp. 68–78.
Schama, S. (1989) Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution. New York: Vintage.
Segrin, C. and Flora, J. (2011) Family Communication. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.
Shafran, R. and Mansell, W. (2001) ‘Perfectionism and Psychopathology: A Review of Research and Treatment’, Clinical Psychology Review, 21(6), pp. 879–906.
Siegel, D.J. (2012) The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press.

Chapter 3: The Enabler

Systemic Abuse
The air is thick with silent,
beneath, the clock ticks in hushed tones.
A house built on bones of secrets,
where hands never rest,
and bruises bloom like neglected roses.
They sit across from each other,
the abuser and the enabler,
eyes averted not by distance,
but because they are one skin,
stitched together by darkness deeper than blood.
He is the fire, she the air —
He burns, she allows him to breath,
She chokes but never coughs,
his embers lodged within her throat,
words smoldering in her silent chest.
His rage ripples through the walls,
shattering the quiet into shards of fear.
She sweeps up the fragments,
fingers bleeding unseen,
whispering “it’s normal,
— not his fault — ,
he’s just stressed, just tired,
the scapegoat made him do it”
But the fire was always there,
needing no excuse.
The scapegoat stumbles into the room —
a shadow stretched too thin —
and the house sighs,
relieved to have its sacrifice.
Their gaze shifts to the scapegoat,
a safe target,
a mirror cracked and cursed
to reflect nothing but their own fractures.
The scapegoat never cries anymore,
not here, where tears are betrayal.
A scream curls in the air,
but only silence answers.
The enabler retreats,
folding into smaller corners,
fingers trembling,
never moving to stop it,
never moving to stop him.
The abuser snarls and strikes,
but her hands are there too —
cradling the blade of his words,
pressing it deep.
The scapegoat flinches,
but nothing breaks,
nothing ever breaks.
This is not a house of people,
but a machine —
its gears oiled by guilt,
chains rusted by shame.
The enabler tightens the bolts,
whispers to the scapegoat,
“You are not enough to stop this.”
The fire roars,
the scapegoat smolders,
and the enabler smiles through the ash.
Abuser and enabler:
one flesh,
woven into the walls,
where pain has no beginning,
and silence has no end.

3.1 Understanding the Enabler’s Role

In dysfunctional families, the Enabler plays a pivotal role in maintaining the appearance of harmony and normalcy. Often, this individual supports or excuses the harmful behavior of a central problematic figure, such as a narcissistic or abusive family member. By minimizing or denying the severity of the dysfunction, the Enabler ensures that the family’s issues remain hidden, shielding them from both internal confrontation and external judgment (Beattie 1987).

The Enabler typically avoids conflict, preferring to uphold a façade of stability. This often comes at the expense of their own needs and well-being, as they prioritize protecting the family’s reputation over addressing underlying problems (Cermak 1986). Over time, they become complicit in perpetuating the very dysfunction they seek to conceal, inadvertently reinforcing unhealthy patterns within the family system (Bradshaw 1988).

Their actions serve several functions within the dysfunctional family:

Preservation of Denial: By denying or rationalizing the problematic behavior, the Enabler helps maintain the family’s collective denial, avoiding uncomfortable truths (Black 1981).
Maintenance of Control: Aligning with the dominant family member can give the Enabler a perceived sense of control in an unpredictable environment (Forward & Buck 1989).
Avoidance of Conflict: The Enabler often believes that confronting issues will lead to greater conflict or instability, so they choose appeasement instead (Beattie 1987).

3.2 Psychological Motivations Behind Enabling

The Enabler’s behavior is driven by a complex interplay of psychological factors:

Fear of Consequences: Confronting the abusive or dysfunctional family member may provoke anger, aggression, or withdrawal of affection. The Enabler fears these repercussions, including potential abandonment or escalation of abuse (Forward & Buck 1989). This fear can lead to paralysis and a preference for maintaining the status quo.

Desire for Control and Stability: In an environment characterized by chaos, the Enabler may deny problems to create an illusion of control and stability. By aligning with the power figure, they believe they can manage the situation more effectively, even if this control is illusory (Black 1981).

Emotional Dependence and Codependency: The Enabler often derives their self-worth from the approval of the dysfunctional family member, leading to emotional codependency (Cermak 1986). This dependency reinforces their need to preserve the relationship at all costs, even if it means ignoring harmful behaviors.

Internalized Beliefs and Low Self-Esteem: Cultural or familial conditioning can instill beliefs that prioritize family unity over individual well-being. Low self-esteem and learned helplessness make the Enabler susceptible to manipulation, as they may believe they deserve no better or that the dysfunction is normal (Beattie 1987).

Avoidance of Shame and Guilt: Acknowledging the family’s dysfunction can evoke feelings of shame and guilt. Upholding a positive family image allows the Enabler to avoid these uncomfortable emotions, using denial as a coping mechanism (Bradshaw 1988).

Perceived Benefits: The Enabler may receive material or emotional rewards for their compliance, such as financial support, social status, or a sense of importance within the family hierarchy. These benefits can further entrench their role, making it more challenging to break free from the dysfunctional dynamics (Forward & Buck 1989).

3.3 Historical Example: Eva Braun

A historical example of the Enabler role is Eva Braun, the long-term companion and eventual wife of Adolf Hitler. Despite being intimately connected to one of history’s most notorious figures, Braun remained largely detached from, or willfully ignorant of, the atrocities committed by the Nazi regime (Görtemaker 2011).

Braun focused on the private sphere of Hitler’s life, cultivating an atmosphere of domestic normalcy that starkly contrasted with the brutality of his leadership. She hosted social events, engaged in leisure activities, and helped humanize Hitler within their inner circle (Görtemaker 2011). Her unwavering loyalty provided emotional support, and she sacrificed her personal desires to remain by his side, even as World War II reached its devastating conclusion.

Psychologically, Braun’s behavior can be understood through her emotional dependence on Hitler. Coming from a modest background, she found a sense of identity, purpose, and importance through her association with him (Rosenbaum 2012). Confronting the reality of his actions may have been too overwhelming, leading her to compartmentalize and focus solely on their personal relationship. Braun’s story illustrates how Enablers, even when not directly involved in harmful actions, play a significant role in sustaining dangerous dynamics by providing support and normalizing the behavior of abusers.

3.4 Impact on Family Dynamics

The Enabler’s actions have profound implications for the entire family system, particularly affecting members cast in roles such as the Scapegoat. By excusing or ignoring abusive behavior, the Enabler allows the dysfunction to persist, often exacerbating the suffering of other family members (Brown 1988).

Invalidation of Experiences: The Enabler’s denial invalidates the experiences of those who are harmed by the dysfunction. The Scapegoat, for instance, may feel unheard and isolated when their concerns are dismissed, leading to feelings of frustration, resentment, and helplessness (Black 1981).

Reinforcement of Abusive Behavior: The lack of confrontation or accountability emboldens the abuser. The Enabler’s support can be perceived as tacit approval, reinforcing the abusive individual’s belief that their behavior is acceptable or without consequences (Bradshaw 1988).

Erosion of Trust: Trust within the family erodes as members realize they cannot rely on the Enabler for support or honesty. This breakdown in trust further fractures relationships and hinders open communication (Beattie 1987).

Internal Conflict and Psychological Toll: The Enabler may experience significant internal conflict, as the stress of denying reality and compromising their integrity takes its toll. This can lead to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues, perpetuating the cycle of dysfunction (Cermak 1986).

Intergenerational Transmission: The enabling behavior can be passed down through generations. Children raised in such environments may internalize these dynamics, learning to suppress their needs and emotions or tolerate abusive behavior in their own relationships, thus continuing the cycle of dysfunction (Friesen et al. 2013).

Eva Braun
sat in the shadow of the beast,
and smiled.
— fragile, breathless,
like a paper doll in a burning house.
She never looked out the windows,
never saw the smoke.
Horrors pressed their faces against the glass,
screaming,
but Eva?
She hummed softly, her hands smoothing the fabric of her dress
as if nothing could touch her here.
Not the cries,
not the blood,
not the world on fire.
She carved a sanctuary from madness,
a room where walls whispered lies
and the beast laughed.
He loomed over her — Hitler,
his hands stained with blood she refused to see.
Her gaze fixed on his smile,
blind to the teeth beneath.
His words — coated in venom — dripped into her ears like honey.
You are my heart, he told her,
and she believed,
even as that heart pumped poison into the veins of a dying nation.
She made tea,
threw parties,
smoothed the wrinkles of his shirt
while the world’s flesh peeled away outside their door.
When the screams grew too loud,
when the stench of death seeped deep into the walls,
she closed her eyes.
She was his,
and in the quiet of their private life,
nothing else mattered,
nothing else existed.
But it did.
The charred bones of millions rattled in the silence,
clattering louder each day,
yet her ears remained sealed with devotion.
How could she hear them,
when every thought was woven from his shadow?
When her identity was shaped by the monster she adored?
She was not the butcher.
No blood was on her hands.
But her fingers turned the locks,
sealed the doors,
kept the horrors from spilling into their delicate bubble of false peace.
She crafted an illusion of safety,
a world where the beast could roam free without consequence.
In doing so, she fed him,
the keeper of his rage,
nurturing it with silence,
with soft smiles and closed eyes.
The others saw through her.
They could smell the rot,
taste the lies in the air,
but when they screamed for help,
her lips formed the cruelest shape —
No.
The scapegoats, the millions —
they were nothing to her,
because they threatened her illusion.
The illusion of love,
that behind the monster,
there was a man.
A man only she could understand,
a man only she could save.
But the monster devoured them all,
and Eva, sweet Eva,
danced at the edge of the abyss,
smiling as the void swallowed the world.
She never saw it coming for her too,
until the final breath —
his hand in hers,
descending together,
ashes falling from the sky like a cruel joke.
She was not innocent,
but innocence was never the point.
She held the beast’s leash,
pretended it was silk.
As the fires raged,
as bodies piled high,
she stood beside him,
grinning like a child who never learned
what a scream really means.
The walls of the bunker knew,
the ghosts knew,
but Eva Braun?
She chose not to know.
Her chosen ignorance
sealing her curse.

3.5 Breaking the Cycle

For a dysfunctional family to heal, it is essential for the Enabler to recognize and address their role in perpetuating harmful dynamics.

Self-Awareness and Acknowledgment: The Enabler must first become aware of their enabling behaviors and the impact these have on themselves and others. This involves honest self-reflection and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths (Beattie 1987).

Therapeutic Intervention: Engaging in therapy can provide the Enabler with professional support to explore underlying fears, build self-esteem, and develop healthier coping strategies. Therapeutic approaches such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or family therapy can be beneficial (Corey 2013).

Establishing Boundaries: Learning to set and maintain healthy boundaries is crucial. This empowers the Enabler to protect their well-being and encourages the dysfunctional family member to take responsibility for their actions (Forward & Buck 1989).

Open Communication: Facilitating honest and open dialogue within the family can help dismantle the façade of normalcy and address underlying issues. This requires a safe environment where all members feel heard and validated (Nichols 2013).

Seeking External Support: Support groups, trusted friends, or community resources can offer additional perspective and encouragement. Connecting with others who have experienced similar situations can reduce feelings of isolation and provide practical advice (Bradshaw 1988).

Personal Development and Self-Care: Prioritizing self-care activities and personal interests helps the Enabler reconnect with their own needs and desires. This fosters a stronger sense of identity and autonomy, reducing reliance on the dysfunctional family dynamic for self-worth (Beattie 1987).

By taking these steps, the Enabler can begin to break free from their role, contributing to healthier family dynamics and paving the way for collective healing.

Beattie, M. (1987) Codependent No More: How to Stop Controlling Others and Start Caring for Yourself. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
Black, C. (1981) It Will Never Happen to Me: Growing Up with Addiction as Youngsters, Adolescents, Adults. New York: Ballantine Books.
Bradshaw, J. (1988) Healing the Shame That Binds You. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications.
Brown, S. (1988) Treating Adult Children of Alcoholics: A Developmental Perspective. New York: Wiley.
Cermak, T.L. (1986) Diagnosing and Treating Co-Dependence: A Guide for Professionals Who Work with Chemical Dependents, Their Spouses, and Children. Minneapolis, MN: Johnson Institute Books.
Corey, G. (2013) Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Forward, S. and Buck, C. (1989) Betrayal of Innocence: Incest and Its Devastation. New York: Penguin Books.
Friesen, M.D., Woodward, L.J., Horwood, L.J., and Fergusson, D.M. (2013) ‘Life Course Persistent Antisocial Behavior in a New Zealand Birth Cohort’, Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44(2), pp. 227–238.
Görtemaker, H. (2011) Eva Braun: Life with Hitler. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Nichols, M.P. (2013) Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods. 10th edn. Boston: Pearson.
Rosenbaum, R. (2012) Explaining Hitler: The Search for the Origins of His Evil. New York: Da Capo Press.

Chapter 4: The Flying Monkey

4.1 Characteristics of the Flying Monkey

In dysfunctional family systems, the term “Flying Monkey” refers to individuals who act on behalf of a narcissist, carrying out their bidding without question. The term is derived from the winged monkeys in The Wizard of Oz, who served the Wicked Witch of the West unquestioningly (Larner 2013). Flying Monkeys manipulate, control, and target the Scapegoat, aiding the narcissist in maintaining their power and control within the family. Their loyalty to the narcissist is often blind, disregarding the harm inflicted on others in the process.

Typical behaviors of Flying Monkeys include spreading misinformation, manipulating situations, and enforcing the narcissist’s agenda. They may engage in spying, spreading rumours, or isolating the scapegoated family member. Lacking empathy, they often seek approval or validation from the narcissist, eager to enhance their own sense of security or importance within the family hierarchy (Goulston 2012). Some Flying Monkeys may even share the narcissist’s manipulative tendencies, aligning with them for mutual benefit.

4.2 Psychological Motivations and Manipulation

Flying Monkeys are often drawn into their role through a combination of personal insecurities and manipulation by the narcissist. Several psychological factors contribute to their complicity:

Fear of Reprisal: Many comply out of fear — fear of becoming the next target of the narcissist’s abuse or fear of losing their place in the narcissist’s inner circle. The narcissist may use intimidation or threats, creating a climate of fear that ensures compliance (Hare 1999).

Desire for Approval and Belonging: Low self-esteem and a strong desire for acceptance make individuals vulnerable to the narcissist’s influence. By aligning with the narcissist, they feel a sense of belonging and importance (Simon 2010).

Emotional Dependence: Emotional reliance on the narcissist can lead Flying Monkeys to prioritize the narcissist’s needs over their own moral judgments. They may become codependent, basing their self-worth on the narcissist’s approval (Beattie 1987).

Shared Beliefs and Values: Some Flying Monkeys genuinely adopt the narcissist’s worldview, internalizing their manipulative and abusive behaviors as acceptable or justified (Young et al. 2003).

Narcissists recruit Flying Monkeys through a variety of manipulative tactics:

Charm and Flattery: They may use charisma and compliments to win over potential allies, making them feel special or valued (Vaknin 2013).

Victim Playing: Narcissists often portray themselves as victims of the Scapegoat or others, garnering sympathy and turning Flying Monkeys against their targets (Brown 2009).

Gaslighting: By distorting reality and causing individuals to doubt their own perceptions, narcissists manipulate Flying Monkeys into believing their version of events (Stern 2018).

Triangulation: Narcissists create divisions among family members, using Flying Monkeys to spread misinformation and deepen rifts, thereby consolidating their control (Rosenberg 2013).

Cognitive Dissonance plays a key role in maintaining the loyalty of Flying Monkeys. When their actions conflict with their personal values, they experience psychological discomfort. To resolve this dissonance, they further justify their behavior, deepening their commitment to the narcissist’s cause (Festinger 1957).

4.3 Parallels with Agents in Totalitarian Regimes

The role of Flying Monkeys in a dysfunctional family mirrors that of secret agents or loyal operatives in totalitarian regimes. Both demonstrate absolute loyalty and obedience to a central figure, whether a narcissist or a dictator. In both cases, a cult of personality elevates the leader to an infallible status (Linz 2000).

Like agents who spy and manipulate to maintain control, Flying Monkeys monitor, report on, and undermine the Scapegoat. They spread misinformation, enforce the narcissist’s rules, silence dissent, and punish non-conformity. Narcissists, like dictators, exploit vulnerabilities, creating a climate of fear that ensures compliance and discourages opposition (Arendt 1973).

The consequences of these dynamics are similar:

Erosion of Trust: Both scenarios result in the breakdown of trust within the group or family, as individuals cannot be certain who is loyal or who may betray them (Havel 1985).
Suppression of Individuality: Members are discouraged from expressing their true thoughts or feelings, leading to a loss of personal autonomy (Fromm 1941).
Perpetuation of Abuse: The harmful behavior of the leader goes unchecked, as Flying Monkeys or agents enforce compliance and suppress challenges to their authority (Linz 2000).

In families, as in societies under totalitarian rule, Flying Monkeys help perpetuate abuse, allowing the narcissist’s harmful behavior to continue unchecked.

4.4 Consequences for the Individual and Others

Aligning with a narcissist comes at a significant personal cost for the Flying Monkey:

Loss of Autonomy: Their sense of identity becomes intertwined with the narcissist’s, eroding their personal autonomy and self-direction (Beattie 1987).
Moral Conflict: Over time, engaging in harmful actions may lead to feelings of guilt, shame, or moral distress, as they recognize the damage caused to others (Hare 1999).
Damaged Relationships: Their relationships with other family members may suffer, as they become isolated or shunned for their behavior. Trust is eroded, and they may find themselves without support if the narcissist turns on them (Rosenberg 2013).
Stunted Personal Growth: Dependence on the narcissist can hinder personal development, as they prioritize the narcissist’s needs over their own growth and well-being (Young et al. 2003).

For the Scapegoat, the involvement of Flying Monkeys amplifies the abuse:

Intensified Isolation: Facing betrayal from multiple family members deepens feelings of isolation and abandonment (Forward & Buck 1989).
Increased Emotional Harm: The collective targeting can lead to long-term emotional damage, including trust issues, anxiety, depression, and complex trauma (van der Kolk 2014).
Obstacles to Validation: The Scapegoat’s experiences are invalidated not only by the narcissist but also by the Flying Monkeys, making it more challenging to seek support or be believed (Brown 2009).

The actions of Flying Monkeys reinforce toxic patterns within the family:

Deepening Divisions: Their manipulation and enforcement of the narcissist’s agenda create deeper rifts among family members, preventing open communication and healing (Larner 2013).
Perpetuation of Dysfunction: By supporting the narcissist, they help maintain the dysfunctional status quo, making it difficult for the family to recognize and address underlying issues (Rosenberg 2013).
Intergenerational Impact: Younger family members may learn and replicate manipulative behaviors, further perpetuating the cycle of abuse across generations (Friesen et al. 2013).

4.5 Breaking the Cycle

Breaking free from the role of a Flying Monkey requires significant self-reflection and personal growth:

Awareness and Acknowledgment: Recognizing their role and its harmful impact is the first crucial step (Beattie 1987).
Seeking Professional Help: Therapy can address underlying issues such as low self-esteem, codependency, or unresolved trauma that make them susceptible to manipulation (Corey 2013).
Establishing Boundaries: Learning to set healthy boundaries with the narcissist and others helps reclaim autonomy and protect personal well-being (Cloud & Townsend 1992).
Rebuilding Identity: Engaging in self-exploration and personal development fosters a stronger sense of self, independent of the narcissist’s influence (Young et al. 2003).

Addressing the manipulative dynamics within the family requires collective effort:

Open Communication: Encouraging honest dialogue can begin to dismantle harmful patterns and promote understanding (Nichols 2013).
Family Therapy: Professional mediation can help address systemic issues, facilitating healthier relationships and mutual respect (Corey 2013).
Commitment to Change: Overcoming deep-rooted dysfunction demands sustained effort and willingness from all members, especially those who have benefited from the status quo (Larner 2013).

However, resistance is common, as those invested in maintaining control may oppose changes that threaten their position. In some cases, individuals may need to establish boundaries or distance themselves from the family to protect their well-being (Cloud & Townsend 1992).

Arendt, H. (1973) The Origins of Totalitarianism. New edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Beattie, M. (1987) Codependent No More: How to Stop Controlling Others and Start Caring for Yourself. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
Brown, N. (2009) Children of the Self-Absorbed: A Grown-Up’s Guide to Getting Over Narcissistic Parents. 2nd edn. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.
Cloud, H. and Townsend, J. (1992) Boundaries: When to Say Yes, How to Say No to Take Control of Your Life. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Corey, G. (2013) Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Forward, S. and Buck, C. (1989) Betrayal of Innocence: Incest and Its Devastation. New York: Penguin Books.
Friesen, M. D., Woodward, L. J., Horwood, L. J., and Fergusson, D. M. (2013) ‘Life Course Persistent Antisocial Behavior in a New Zealand Birth Cohort’, Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44(2), pp. 227–238.
Fromm, E. (1941) Escape from Freedom. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
Goulston, M. (2012) Just Listen: Discover the Secret to Getting Through to Absolutely Anyone. New York: AMACOM.
Hare, R. D. (1999) Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us. New York: Guilford Press.
Havel, V. (1985) ‘The Power of the Powerless’, in Keane, J. (ed.) The Power of the Powerless: Citizens Against the State in Central-Eastern Europe. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 23–96.
Herman, J. L. (1992) Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence — from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. New York: Basic Books.
Larner, B. (2013) The Narcissist in Your Life: Recognizing the Patterns and Learning to Break Free. New York: HarperCollins.
Linz, J. J. (2000) Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Nichols, M. P. (2013) Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods. 10th edn. Boston: Pearson.
Rosenberg, R. (2013) The Human Magnet Syndrome: Why We Love People Who Hurt Us. Chicago, IL: Health Communications.
Simon, G. (2010) In Sheep’s Clothing: Understanding and Dealing with Manipulative People. Little Rock, AR: Parkhurst Brothers.
Stern, R. (2018) The Gaslight Effect: How to Spot and Survive the Hidden Manipulation Others Use to Control Your Life. Revised edn. New York: Harmony Books.
van der Kolk, B. A. (2014) The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York: Viking.
Vaknin, S. (2013) Malignant Self-Love: Narcissism Revisited. Skopje: Narcissus Publications.
Young, K. S., Klosko, J. S., and Weishaar, M. E. (2003) Schema Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide. New York: Guilford Press.

Chapter 5: The Scapegoat

5.1 Characteristics of the Scapegoat

In dysfunctional family systems, the Scapegoat is the individual unjustly blamed for the family’s problems, serving as a diversion from underlying issues that family members refuse to confront (Engel 2006). This role allows the dysfunctional leader — often a narcissistic or abusive figure — to avoid accountability by projecting faults onto one family member. The Scapegoat becomes the target of the family’s frustrations, insecurities, and unresolved conflicts.

Typically, Scapegoats are independent thinkers who are unafraid to question family dynamics and challenge manipulative behaviors. Their moral integrity and emotional honesty threaten the family’s collective denial and façade of normalcy, leading to further isolation (Forward & Buck 1989). Often alienated and unjustly blamed for conflicts they did not cause, Scapegoats stand apart, unable or unwilling to conform to the toxic family narrative (Gemmill & Heisler 1972).

5.2 Psychological Impact and Resilience

Being assigned the role of Scapegoat leads to significant emotional and psychological challenges. Constant criticism, blame, and isolation can result in chronic stress, anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem (Johnson 1994). Trust issues often develop due to betrayal and lack of support from family members. Over time, this negative treatment can cause confusion about one’s identity and self-worth, leading to internalized guilt and shame (Engel 2006).

However, many Scapegoats develop remarkable resilience. Awareness of the dysfunction around them strengthens their commitment to truth and personal integrity. Emotional isolation fosters independence and critical thinking skills. Their desire for change often motivates them to seek healthier relationships and environments outside the family system (Hall & Fincham 2006). The courage to confront uncomfortable truths and reject the family’s false narrative sets them apart, as they refuse to accept blame for problems they did not create.

5.3 Historical Examples: Socrates and Galileo Galilei

The Greek philosopher Socrates exemplifies the Scapegoat role in a societal context. Known for his method of questioning authority and encouraging critical thinking, Socrates challenged the established norms of Athenian society (Guthrie 1971). During a time of political turmoil and uncertainty, his teachings were perceived as a threat to traditional values and existing power structures.

Accused of corrupting the youth and impiety, Socrates was scapegoated for the decline in moral standards and social unrest (Plato 1997). Despite being offered the opportunity to renounce his beliefs to avoid punishment, Socrates remained steadfast in his commitment to truth and philosophical inquiry. He was ultimately sentenced to death by hemlock poisoning. Socrates’ moral integrity and resilience in the face of persecution illustrate the Scapegoat’s role in challenging dysfunctional dynamics and upholding personal principles.

Galileo Galilei, the Italian astronomer and physicist, also embodied the Scapegoat role when his support for heliocentrism challenged the Catholic Church’s geocentric doctrine (Drake 1957). His groundbreaking scientific discoveries provided evidence that the Earth revolves around the Sun, contradicting the Church’s teachings and threatening its authority.

In response, the Church accused Galileo of heresy and ordered him to stand trial before the Roman Inquisition. Under threat of severe punishment, he was forced to recant his findings publicly and spent the remainder of his life under house arrest (Shea & Artigas 2003). Despite these adversities, Galileo continued his scientific work in secret, demonstrating resilience and a steadfast commitment to truth. His experiences highlight how challenging entrenched beliefs can lead to personal suffering but also pave the way for societal progress.

Both Socrates and Galileo exemplify the Scapegoat’s role in confronting dysfunctional systems — whether familial or societal — and the potential for such individuals to drive meaningful change despite facing significant opposition.

5.4 Pathways to Healing and Empowerment

For Scapegoats, healing begins with validating their own experiences and recognizing that they are not to blame for the family’s dysfunction (Engel 2006). Practicing self-compassion helps counteract internalized guilt and self-doubt. Professional support, such as therapy or support groups, is essential in processing trauma and rebuilding self-esteem (Herman 1992).

Setting clear boundaries is a vital step in protecting oneself from further emotional harm and reinforcing self-respect (Cloud & Townsend 1992). Engaging in self-discovery and embracing personal strengths nurtures a sense of identity separate from the family’s scapegoating role. Building healthy relationships based on mutual respect and trust can help restore confidence in others and provide emotional nourishment (Johnson 2013).

Growth and fulfillment come from pursuing personal passions and continuous learning. Many Scapegoats transform their painful experiences into sources of strength, using their resilience to challenge injustice and support others facing similar struggles (van der Kolk 2014). Practices such as mindfulness meditation, physical exercise, and engaging in creative outlets promote overall emotional balance. Letting go of resentment through acceptance and forgiveness fosters inner peace and allows for personal growth (Neff 2003).

Ultimately, Scapegoats can harness their adversity to develop adaptability and optimism, thriving despite the challenges they’ve faced. By embracing their unique perspectives and capacities for critical thought, they contribute positively to their own lives and potentially to broader societal progress.

Cloud, H. & Townsend, J. (1992). Boundaries: When to Say Yes, How to Say No to Take Control of Your Life. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Drake, S. (1957). Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. New York: Doubleday.
Engel, B. (2006). The Emotionally Abusive Relationship: How to Stop Being Abused and How to Stop Abusing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Forward, S. & Buck, C. (1989). Toxic Parents: Overcoming Their Hurtful Legacy and Reclaiming Your Life. New York: Bantam Books.
Gemmill, G. & Heisler, W. (1972). ‘Hidden Conflict in Organizations: The Scapegoat Role’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 16(2), pp. 161–173.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1971). The Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, J. H. & Fincham, F. D. (2006). ‘Self–Forgiveness: The Stepchild of Forgiveness Research’, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(5), pp. 621–637.
Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence — from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. New York: Basic Books.
Johnson, S. M. (1994). Character Styles. New York: W. W. Norton.
Johnson, S. M. (2013). Love Sense: The Revolutionary New Science of Romantic Relationships. New York: Little, Brown Spark.
Neff, K. D. (2003). ‘Self-Compassion: An Alternative Conceptualization of a Healthy Attitude Toward Oneself’, Self and Identity, 2(2), pp. 85–101.
Plato (1997). Plato: Complete Works. Edited by J. M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Shea, W. R. & Artigas, M. (2003). Galileo in Rome: The Rise and Fall of a Troublesome Genius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York: Viking.

Chapter 6: Additional Roles in Dysfunctional Families

6.1 The Hero

In dysfunctional family systems, the Hero emerges as the family member who strives to bring positive attention to the family through personal achievements and success. Often the eldest child, though not exclusively, the Hero assumes this role to mask the family’s underlying dysfunction by excelling academically, professionally, or socially (Black 1981). Their accomplishments serve to divert scrutiny from the family’s deeper issues, creating an illusion of normalcy and competence.

The Hero typically takes on significant responsibilities within the family, often caring for younger siblings or managing household duties beyond their years (Ackerman 1983). Their behavior is geared toward pleasing others, especially authority figures, which leads them to suppress their own needs and emotions. They hold themselves to impossibly high standards and work tirelessly to maintain an image of perfection (Wegscheider-Cruse 1989).

While their efforts help sustain the family’s façade, the Hero pays a personal price. The pressure to succeed can lead to anxiety, perfectionism, and burnout (Shafran & Mansell 2001). They may struggle with identity, basing their self-worth solely on achievements and finding it challenging to admit vulnerability. Isolation is common, as their focus on duties leaves little room for social connections and personal development (Cermak 1986).

6.2 The Lost Child

The Lost Child copes with a dysfunctional family environment by withdrawing emotionally and physically. This family member avoids conflict and attention, retreating into a solitary world of fantasy, books, or hobbies (Wegscheider-Cruse 1989). Often invisible within the family dynamic, the Lost Child stays quiet and out of the way to reduce stress and avoid drawing negative attention.

Emotionally detached, the Lost Child suppresses their feelings, preferring to evade the family’s conflicts rather than confront them. This isolation often leads to feelings of loneliness, low self-esteem, and difficulty forming relationships (Black 1981). Without regular interaction and validation, they may struggle to develop a strong sense of self and may defer decisions to others, further diminishing their presence within the family.

6.3 The Mascot

The Mascot, also known as the Clown, uses humor and lightheartedness to diffuse tension and distract from the family’s problems. They seek to keep the family entertained, often making light of serious issues to create a sense of relief (Black 1981). The Mascot’s charm and playfulness serve as a protective mechanism, but beneath the surface, they often struggle with deep insecurity and emotional suppression.

Relying constantly on humor to manage the family’s mood can lead to anxiety and emotional exhaustion. While they succeed in lightening the family atmosphere, this role can prevent them from developing deep, authentic relationships. They may avoid addressing their own issues, focusing instead on others’ needs (Wegscheider-Cruse 1989). The pressure to maintain their upbeat persona can lead to an identity crisis, as they fear rejection if they reveal their true feelings.

6.4 Conclusion

These additional roles — the Hero, Lost Child, and Mascot — demonstrate the various ways individuals within dysfunctional families cope with the stresses around them. Each role serves a purpose within the family system, contributing to the maintenance of a façade of normalcy. However, these roles often come at a significant emotional cost to the individuals who assume them.

Whether through overachievement, withdrawal, or humor, these family members navigate their environments by adopting behaviors that help them survive but may hinder their personal growth and well-being (Cermak 1986). The historical examples provided offer insight into how these dynamics play out, emphasizing the complexity of each role.

Healing and personal growth require recognizing and stepping out of these entrenched patterns. By finding and embracing one’s authentic self, individuals can begin to address the underlying issues within the family and pursue healthier relationships and personal fulfillment (Brown 1988).

Ackerman, R. (1983). Children of Alcoholics: A Guidebook for Educators, Therapists, and Parents. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Aronson, T. (1994). Prince Eddy and the Homosexual Underworld. London: John Murray.
Black, C. (1981). It Will Never Happen to Me: Growing Up with Addiction as Youngsters, Adolescents, and Adults. New York: Ballantine Books.
Brown, S. (1988). Treating Adult Children of Alcoholics: A Developmental Perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Cermak, T. L. (1986). Diagnosing and Treating Co-Dependence: A Guide for Professionals Who Work with Chemical Dependents, Their Spouses, and Children. Minneapolis: Johnson Institute.
Cook, A. (2006). Albert Victor: The Life of Prince Eddy. London: Coronet Books.
Habegger, A. (2001). My Wars Are Laid Away in Books: The Life of Emily Dickinson. New York: Random House.
Maland, C. (1989). Chaplin and American Culture: The Evolution of a Star Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Robinson, D. (1985). Chaplin: His Life and Art. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sewall, R. B. (1974). The Life of Emily Dickinson. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Shafran, R., & Mansell, W. (2001). ‘Perfectionism and Psychopathology: A Review of Research and Treatment’. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(6), 879–906.
Wegscheider-Cruse, S. (1989). Another Chance: Hope and Health for the Alcoholic Family. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

Chapter 7: Breaking the Cycle

7.1 Recognizing Dysfunctional Patterns

Breaking the cycle of dysfunction within a family begins with the crucial step of recognizing unhealthy dynamics. In dysfunctional families, members are often entrenched in rigid roles — such as the Hero, Scapegoat, Enabler, Lost Child, or Mascot — which hinder open communication and foster environments of denial, blame, and emotional neglect (Wegscheider-Cruse 1989). These roles serve as coping mechanisms but ultimately perpetuate the dysfunction by obscuring underlying issues.

Patterns of enmeshment, where boundaries are blurred and overly permeable, or disengagement, where boundaries are too rigid and family members are emotionally detached, reveal deeper systemic problems (Minuchin 1974). Recognizing these patterns involves honest self-reflection and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths about one’s family and oneself.

Through self-examination, individuals can gain insight into how these roles have shaped their lives. This process includes:

Identifying Behavioral Patterns: Noticing repetitive behaviors that contribute to dysfunction, such as avoidance, aggression, or compliance (Ackerman 1983).
Recognizing Triggers: Understanding situations or interactions that elicit strong emotional responses or unhealthy reactions.
Assessing Relationships: Evaluating the quality of relationships within the family and determining where boundaries are lacking or excessively rigid.

Acknowledging the emotional toll of being confined to these roles is the first step toward meaningful change. It empowers individuals to take responsibility for their own well-being and begin the journey toward healing.

7.2 Strategies for Breaking Free

Each family role presents unique challenges, and breaking free requires targeted strategies tailored to the individual’s experiences.

For the Hero

Embrace Imperfection: Accept that perfection is unattainable and that making mistakes is a natural part of growth (Shafran & Mansell 2001).
Set Realistic Goals: Establish achievable objectives that align with personal values rather than external expectations.
Prioritize Self-Care: Engage in activities that promote physical and emotional well-being, recognizing that self-care is not selfish but essential (Neff 2003).
Explore Identity Beyond Achievements: Cultivate interests and relationships that are not tied to performance or success metrics.
Seek Support: Allow yourself to ask for help and share responsibilities, reducing the burden of carrying the family’s problems alone (Cermak 1986).

For the Scapegoat

Affirm Self-Worth: Recognize your inherent value independent of others’ perceptions or criticisms (Branden 1994).
Set Clear Boundaries: Protect yourself from further emotional harm by establishing and maintaining healthy boundaries (Cloud & Townsend 1992).
Surround Yourself with Supportive People: Build a network of friends, mentors, or support groups who validate your experiences and offer encouragement.
Express Emotions Healthily: Find constructive outlets for emotions, such as journaling, art, or therapy, to process feelings of anger, sadness, or frustration (Gross & John 2003).

For the Enabler

Recognize Your Role in Dysfunction: Acknowledge how your actions may inadvertently contribute to maintaining unhealthy family dynamics (Beattie 1987).
Build Self-Esteem Independently: Develop a sense of self-worth that is not reliant on the approval of others, particularly the dysfunctional family member.
Practice Open Communication: Encourage honest dialogue about feelings and concerns, which can help address underlying issues (Satir 1988).
Establish Boundaries with Manipulative Family Members: Learn to say no and assert your needs without guilt.

For the Flying Monkey

Question the Narcissist’s Narrative: Critically evaluate the information presented by the narcissistic family member and seek multiple perspectives (Simon 2010).
Reflect on Personal Values: Consider whether your actions align with your moral beliefs and the kind of person you wish to be.
Reduce Dependency on Validation: Build confidence and self-esteem through personal achievements and self-acceptance.
Make Amends if Possible: Acknowledge any harm caused and take steps to repair relationships, if appropriate and safe to do so.

For the Lost Child

Gradually Increase Social Interactions: Start by engaging in low-pressure social activities to rebuild connections with others (Wegscheider-Cruse 1989).
Express Yourself Creatively: Utilize art, music, writing, or other creative outlets to explore and communicate emotions.
Explore Personal Interests: Invest time in hobbies or activities that bring joy and foster a sense of identity.
Build Healthy Relationships: Seek out relationships that are supportive and encourage personal growth.

For the Mascot

Acknowledge and Express True Feelings: Allow yourself to experience and communicate emotions beyond humor, including vulnerability (Johnson 2013).
Balance Humor with Seriousness: Recognize when humor is helpful and when it may be deflecting from important issues.
Address Underlying Insecurities: Work on building self-esteem and addressing fears that others may not accept you without the comedic persona.
Foster Authentic Connections: Engage in relationships where you feel safe to be your genuine self.

7.3 The Importance of Therapy and Support

Therapy is a powerful tool in breaking free from dysfunctional family roles. It provides a safe and supportive environment to explore feelings, heal from trauma, and develop healthier coping strategies.

Individual Therapy: Focuses on personal growth, helping individuals understand their roles and how to change maladaptive patterns (Corey 2013).
Family Therapy: Addresses systemic issues within the family, promoting healthier interactions and communication (Nichols 2013).
Group Therapy: Offers community support and the opportunity to connect with others facing similar challenges.
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT): Helps challenge and reframe negative thought patterns that contribute to dysfunctional behaviors (Beck 2011).

Building support networks outside the family is equally important. Trusted friends, mentors, support groups, and community resources offer encouragement, guidance, and alternative perspectives.

Overcoming barriers to seeking help — such as stigma, cultural norms, or financial concerns — is crucial for long-term healing. Many communities offer sliding-scale fees, low-cost counseling services, or online resources to make therapy more accessible.

7.4 Building Healthy Relationships

Healthy relationships are foundational to breaking the cycle of dysfunction. Developing effective communication skills and fostering mutual respect are essential components.

Effective Communication: Practice active listening, express needs clearly, and engage in constructive conflict resolution (Rosenberg 2003).
Setting and Maintaining Boundaries: Establish what is acceptable in relationships and respect others’ boundaries, which fosters trust and safety (Cloud & Townsend 1992).
Cultivating Self-Love and Acceptance: Engage in self-care, challenge negative self-talk, and acknowledge personal achievements (Neff 2003).
Building Trusting Relationships: Be reliable, show empathy, and allow yourself to be vulnerable with others, strengthening emotional connections.
Expanding Social Networks: Participate in activities, volunteer work, or community events to meet diverse people and broaden perspectives.

Continuous personal growth is vital. Setting goals, learning new skills, and regular self-reflection help individuals not only break free from dysfunctional patterns but also thrive beyond them.

By embracing these strategies and seeking support, individuals can transform their lives, moving from roles that confine them to fulfilling lives defined by authenticity and healthy relationships. Breaking the cycle of dysfunction is challenging but achievable with commitment, self-compassion, and the willingness to seek help.

Ackerman, R. (1983). Children of Alcoholics: A Guidebook for Educators, Therapists, and Parents. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Basics and Beyond. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press.
Beattie, M. (1987). Codependent No More: How to Stop Controlling Others and Start Caring for Yourself. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
Branden, N. (1994). The Six Pillars of Self-Esteem. New York: Bantam.
Cloud, H., & Townsend, J. (1992). Boundaries: When to Say Yes, How to Say No to Take Control of Your Life. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Corey, G. (2013). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 9th edn. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). ‘Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), pp. 348–362.
Johnson, S. M. (2013). Love Sense: The Revolutionary New Science of Romantic Relationships. New York: Little, Brown Spark.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and Family Therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Neff, K. D. (2003). ‘Self-Compassion: An Alternative Conceptualization of a Healthy Attitude Toward Oneself’. Self and Identity, 2(2), pp. 85–101.
Nichols, M. P. (2013). Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods. 10th edn. Boston: Pearson.
Rosenberg, M. B. (2003). Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life. 2nd edn. Encinitas, CA: PuddleDancer Press.
Satir, V. (1988). The New Peoplemaking. Mountain View, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
Shafran, R., & Mansell, W. (2001). ‘Perfectionism and Psychopathology: A Review of Research and Treatment’. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(6), pp. 879–906.
Simon, G. (2010). In Sheep’s Clothing: Understanding and Dealing with Manipulative People. Little Rock, AR: Parkhurst Brothers.
Wegscheider-Cruse, S. (1989). Another Chance: Hope and Health for the Alcoholic Family. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.